Your personal information you provide will be transfered and stored as encrypted data.
You have the ability to update and remove your personal information.
You consent to our cookies if you continue to use this website.
Allow cookies for
Necessary Cookies Necessary Cookies cannot be unchecked, because they are necessary for our website to function properly. They store your language, currency, shopping cart and login credentials.
Analytics Cookies We use google.com analytics and bing.com to monitor site usage and page statistics to help us improve our website. You may turn this on or off using the tick boxes above.
Marketing Cookies Marketing Cookies do track personal data. Google and Bing monitor your page views and purchases for use in advertising and re-marketing on other websites. You may turn this on or off using the tick boxes above.
Social Cookies These 3rd Party Cookies do track personal data. This allows Facebook, Twitter and Pinterest integration. eg. shows the Facebook 'LIKE' button. They will however be able to view what you do on our website. You may turn this on or off using the tick boxes above.
Classically British Location: Epsom, Surrey, England
Total posts: 5688
Posted:Ok, well I was making myself a set of doubles but thought I had more wick than I did (I thought I had 6 foot of wick - I forgot I used that on my single....anyway)
Working with what I've got I've basically got to choices.
1) I cut the wick lengthways- I can still have a deep wick, wrapped around about 4 times but it'll be quite a thin (4cm!)
2)I leave it thick (8cm) but only wrap it round twice...
Which would be best? My thoughts were that deeper would give longer burn time, whereas a wider wick would give brighter flame?
Is this right or will they sort of balance out?
I don't want to but anymore wick as I'm on a big saving spree at the moment, so that isn't an option... Although I have got some straggly bits off my UV staff which have never been burnt but have been painted in UV orange paint....)
Burner of Toast Spinner of poi Slacker of enormous magnitude
Posted:Don't cut the wick lengthwise. It'll fray terribly. A 4-cm thick wrap will be adequate.
I haven't done rigorous testing, but my guess is that wide-shallow will give you a shorter burn (no idea how much shorter). That would really depend on the relative surface area/volume ratios of the two options.
But in this case, I think you've only got one option.
Posted:towel dont last that long on fire but if you can manage to completely cover it over with the kevlar it should act only as a fuel absorber and not burn. Dunno how youd do this with staff, I ve only done it with some poi but you could have a narrower piece of towel wrapped round the stick then wrap a wider piece of kevlar over it and close up each end with that garden wire stuff - that'd probly seal it in.
Posted:Quote: Could I beef the wick up with some toweling wick underneath the Kevlar? Or would this only last a few burns before disintergrating?
I haven't done it myself, but as long as the toweling is completely covered, you should be good. Kevlar is a pretty amazing insulator: if you ever cut apart a set of well-used wicks, you'll see that only the outer quarter-inch or so is charred.
I think it's worth a shot--just remember, if the towel is exposed, it'll burn, and you don't want that. What might work best would be to cut long strips of towel a bit narrower and shorter than the kevlar strips, and roll a towel strip together with a kevlar strip, so you wind up with alternating layers. Just a thought--you should play around with it. EDITED_BY: adamrice (1078933949)