Forums > Technical Discussion > is small wire wool spin possible?

Login/Join to Participate

RowynSILVER Member
member
43 posts
Location: Boucherville, QUbec, Canada


Posted:
HI i am thinking of doing some wire wool spinning and i was wundering if it would be possible to do it with just a small amouth of wool. So that there would only be only a small amount of sparckles : like a rain of sparks surrounding me ubbidea It would really look nice and be less dangerous.. anyway let me know if you tried anything like that ubblocoTanx!

what ever happen, pain willl not be the end.


fNiGOLD Member
master of disaster
3,354 posts
Location: New York, USA


Posted:
did you read [Old link] ?

kyrian: I've felt your finger connect with me many times
lou kitten: sneaky little meatball..
ezz: please corrupt me more


RowynSILVER Member
member
43 posts
Location: Boucherville, QUbec, Canada


Posted:
Yes i did read it but there is no specification what so ever about a low amout of wire wool. What i wanna know is: how does it react with a small amout of wire wool tanx

what ever happen, pain willl not be the end.


Sporkyaddict
663 posts
Location: Glasgow


Posted:
It should just give you a shorter burn time. I'm not sure about less sparks but then I don't do wire wool that often.

There's only one way to find out. I'll try it out tonight and report back.

Have faith in what you can do and respect for what you can't


Mint SauceBRONZE Member
veteran
1,453 posts
Location: Lancs England


Posted:
less wire wool is a bit crap and very disappointing



few sparks and only for a few secs

before i met those lot i thought they'd be a bunch of dreadlocked hippies that smoked, set things on fire ,and drank a lot of tea but then when i met them....oh wait (PyroWill)


UCOFSILVER Member
..lonely.
15,416 posts
Location: South Wales


Posted:
I rated it as very informative biggrin

RowynSILVER Member
member
43 posts
Location: Boucherville, QUbec, Canada


Posted:
thank you for sharing your experience with me wink I will experiment a few variation and tell you what i found out :P
cheers

what ever happen, pain willl not be the end.


MedusaSILVER Member
veteran
1,433 posts
Location: 8 days at Cloudbreak, 6 in Perth, Australia


Posted:
I find the less you pack in the less likely it is to burn at all....The cages are meant to be pretty tightly packed to get the effect.

fNiGOLD Member
master of disaster
3,354 posts
Location: New York, USA


Posted:
not so; to get the maximum effect you want many strips in there yes, but you don't want them tightly packed otherwise they just clump together instead of showering out longer

kyrian: I've felt your finger connect with me many times
lou kitten: sneaky little meatball..
ezz: please corrupt me more


firespiralmember
21 posts
Location: Sunny Coast, Qld


Posted:
 Written by: Rowyn


.. i was wundering if it would be possible to do it with just a small amouth of wool. So that there would only be only a small amount of sparckles ..


eek

what's the point? rolleyes

try sparklers sticky taped on the end of your toys. wink

Art is neither a profession, nor a hobby.
Art is a way of life.


HOP Newsletter
Sign up to get the latest on sales, new releases and more...