Forums > Social Discussion > What does "Technical" mean?
Login/Join to Participate110% MONKEY EVERY TIME ALL THE TIME JUST CANT STOP THE MONKEY
3,149 posts
Location: London
3,149 posts
Location: London
Posted:
PLEASE NOTE: Anyone who posts the Dictionary definition of the word Technical in this thread is a very annoying person
People talk about 'Technical' poi quite a lot. Sometimes in a positive way, but often in a way that's almost derogatory.
What does it mean to you? What do you think it means to others?
Moves that are difficult?
Ugly moves?
Moves where your feet are stationary?
Moves that concentrate on details rather than the whole?
if you dance, can your poi be technical?
can technical poi 'flow', or is flow the opposite of tech?
a genuinely rather confused monkey
EDITED_BY: simian (1101773439)
PLEASE NOTE: Anyone who posts the Dictionary definition of the word Technical in this thread is a very annoying person
People talk about 'Technical' poi quite a lot. Sometimes in a positive way, but often in a way that's almost derogatory.
What does it mean to you? What do you think it means to others?
Moves that are difficult?
Ugly moves?
Moves where your feet are stationary?
Moves that concentrate on details rather than the whole?
if you dance, can your poi be technical?
can technical poi 'flow', or is flow the opposite of tech?
a genuinely rather confused monkey
EDITED_BY: simian (1101773439)
"Switching between different kinds of chuu chuu sometimes gives this "urgh wtf?" effect because it's giving people the phi phenomenon."
SILVER Member
Carpal \'Tunnel
3,899 posts
Location: Austin, Texas, USA
Carpal \'Tunnel
3,899 posts
Location: Austin, Texas, USA
Posted:
hmm... I guess so!
- well, except I knew what simian was talking about from the beginning - that would be the difference for me anyway!
I like the way mo-seph put things as technical refering to the way you think about it instead of the move itself.
Written by: ado-p
So would this be a technical discussion then?
hmm... I guess so!
- well, except I knew what simian was talking about from the beginning - that would be the difference for me anyway!I like the way mo-seph put things as technical refering to the way you think about it instead of the move itself.
-v-
Wiederstand ist Zwecklos!
GOLD Member
old hand
920 posts
Location: New Zealand
old hand
920 posts
Location: New Zealand
Posted:
Wow 2 whole pages and no blood shed, that must be a first.
vanize, i'd love to agree with you but first i'm gonna post a couple new threads on the matter and then refer you to do a search before finally accepting that I do actually agree with all the points above Today, i'm very bored of working
m
Wow 2 whole pages and no blood shed, that must be a first.
vanize, i'd love to agree with you but first i'm gonna post a couple new threads on the matter and then refer you to do a search before finally accepting that I do actually agree with all the points above
Today, i'm very bored of workingm
Spherculism ~:~ The Act of becoming Spherculish.
SILVER Member
Carpal \'Tunnel
3,899 posts
Location: Austin, Texas, USA
Carpal \'Tunnel
3,899 posts
Location: Austin, Texas, USA
Posted:
touche PPP.
touche PPP.
-v-
Wiederstand ist Zwecklos!
GOLD Member
Pirate Ninja
3,882 posts
Location: Galway/Ireland
Pirate Ninja
3,882 posts
Location: Galway/Ireland
Posted:
for me
tech = thinking about it. logical progression.
non tech = intuitive. feels nice
or
I pull funny faces when im doing tech moves
I smile when im doing spinny intuitive stuff.
But what happens when tech becomes intuitive...
can a tech move become non tech for an individual?
Should I have read the rest of this discussion?
Probably.
for me
tech = thinking about it. logical progression.
non tech = intuitive. feels nice
or
I pull funny faces when im doing tech moves
I smile when im doing spinny intuitive stuff.
But what happens when tech becomes intuitive...
can a tech move become non tech for an individual?
Should I have read the rest of this discussion?
Probably.
Love is the law.
GOLD Member
old hand
920 posts
Location: New Zealand
old hand
920 posts
Location: New Zealand
Posted:
Nope, you've hit the nail on the head i think
When tech becomes intuitive others call it tech but you just call it normal spinning. 3bt weave was technically very difficult at first.
Nope, you've hit the nail on the head i think
When tech becomes intuitive others call it tech but you just call it normal spinning. 3bt weave was technically very difficult at first.
Spherculism ~:~ The Act of becoming Spherculish.
BRONZE Member
Classically British
5,689 posts
Location: Epsom, Surrey, England
Classically British
5,689 posts
Location: Epsom, Surrey, England
Posted:
Technical to me means:-
Any move where you have to adjust the way you spin normally
e.g Isolations, 5+ weaves, antispin
Technical to me means:-
Any move where you have to adjust the way you spin normally
e.g Isolations, 5+ weaves, antispin
Burner of Toast
Spinner of poi
Slacker of enormous magnitude
geek, level 1
5,300 posts
Location: everywhere
5,300 posts
Location: everywhere
Posted:
i like very much the idea that tech stops being tech when you don't have to think about it.
so for me, right now, tech moves are: some antispin, some of the more complicated throws, foot catches and throws, some of the buzzsaw fountain variations ive been working on, most of the negative space stuff.
recently intuitive is another category....
but then are you always saying 'tech' is something different for each person? or is there some level you reach that allows you to become 'tech'?
hmm.
i like very much the idea that tech stops being tech when you don't have to think about it.
so for me, right now, tech moves are: some antispin, some of the more complicated throws, foot catches and throws, some of the buzzsaw fountain variations ive been working on, most of the negative space stuff.
recently intuitive is another category....
but then are you always saying 'tech' is something different for each person? or is there some level you reach that allows you to become 'tech'?
hmm.
Holistic Spinner (I hope)
GOLD Member
Pirate Ninja
3,882 posts
Location: Galway/Ireland
Pirate Ninja
3,882 posts
Location: Galway/Ireland
Posted:
I think you answered your own question bluecat
If people are learning from you it could be tech for them, then you learn more and so on
its a technical cycle like
I think you answered your own question bluecat
If people are learning from you it could be tech for them, then you learn more and so on
its a technical cycle like
Love is the law.
member
43 posts
Location: Bexhill england
43 posts
Location: Bexhill england
Posted:
i like to think not this this is to do with technical but i like to think that the poi is like an extetion of my arm its weird but it work, so i like to feel the poi and an feel the spce its in, like to widen the aura. i also love to practice on the beach alone its realy kool
i like to think not this this is to do with technical but i like to think that the poi is like an extetion of my arm its weird but it work, so i like to feel the poi and an feel the spce its in, like to widen the aura. i also love to practice on the beach alone its realy kool
GOLD Member
old hand
920 posts
Location: New Zealand
old hand
920 posts
Location: New Zealand
Posted:
Sounds to me like you're a natural born spherculist
Sounds to me like you're a natural born spherculist
Spherculism ~:~ The Act of becoming Spherculish.
BRONZE Member
stranger
3 posts
Location: Austin, Texas, USA
stranger
3 posts
Location: Austin, Texas, USA
Posted:
Help I am new. you are all way to tech for me. Please add an "a" to tech, and we will call it teach. I do know that creation is the heart of all true art. I have seen the dance of poi and want to enter this realm of fire
Help I am new. you are all way to tech for me. Please add an "a" to tech, and we will call it teach. I do know that creation is the heart of all true art. I have seen the dance of poi and want to enter this realm of fire
NYC
9,232 posts
Location: NYC, NY, USA
9,232 posts
Location: NYC, NY, USA
Posted:
Well said BC. I personally believe that 'technical' is a relative term much like "tall". Everyone is tall to a baby. Everything it technical to a newbie. However we do have some context.
I wonder if there aren't areas of technical as well. I know some spinners that spend time working on posture and dance in a 'technical way'... doing very simple moves but focusing on the exact place that they are done. I'd consiter this to be 'technical' but not in the way that we traditionally use the word.
Written by: bluecat
i like very much the idea that tech stops being tech when you don't have to think about it.
so for me, right now, tech moves are: some antispin, some of the more complicated throws, foot catches and throws, some of the buzzsaw fountain variations ive been working on, most of the negative space stuff.
recently intuitive is another category....
but then are you always saying 'tech' is something different for each person? or is there some level you reach that allows you to become 'tech'?
Well said BC. I personally believe that 'technical' is a relative term much like "tall". Everyone is tall to a baby. Everything it technical to a newbie. However we do have some context.
I wonder if there aren't areas of technical as well. I know some spinners that spend time working on posture and dance in a 'technical way'... doing very simple moves but focusing on the exact place that they are done. I'd consiter this to be 'technical' but not in the way that we traditionally use the word.
Well, shall we go?
Yes, let's go.
[They do not move.]
NYC
9,232 posts
Location: NYC, NY, USA
9,232 posts
Location: NYC, NY, USA
Posted:
The dictionary does have some interesting things to add but I won't disrespect the first post.
The dictionary does have some interesting things to add but I won't disrespect the first post.
Well, shall we go?
Yes, let's go.
[They do not move.]
GOLD Member
Stream Entrant
2,829 posts
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Stream Entrant
2,829 posts
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posted:
To my mind, technical is about symmetry, and having the technique or the skill to hold tight planes, without sloppy transitions. I think good technique is based on understanding how the different parts of the body work together, and having the necessary body flexibility to undertake a the move.
I would consider having a good technique as a pre-requisite for flow and dance. I don’t think it’s got anything to do with difficulty, or impressing anyone by the number of beats. A three beat move is only part of the progression to a seven or nine beat move. If you work, and acquire the flexibility to get the seven beat move, then chances are the three (and other moves) will be a lot easier to do (ditto nine to seven).
So to get technical, was that right or left in the lateral plane, about the dorso-ventral axis?
To my mind, technical is about symmetry, and having the technique or the skill to hold tight planes, without sloppy transitions. I think good technique is based on understanding how the different parts of the body work together, and having the necessary body flexibility to undertake a the move.
I would consider having a good technique as a pre-requisite for flow and dance. I don’t think it’s got anything to do with difficulty, or impressing anyone by the number of beats. A three beat move is only part of the progression to a seven or nine beat move. If you work, and acquire the flexibility to get the seven beat move, then chances are the three (and other moves) will be a lot easier to do (ditto nine to seven).
So to get technical, was that right or left in the lateral plane, about the dorso-ventral axis?
If we as members of the human race practice meditation, we can transcend our fear, despair, and forgetfulness. Meditation is not an escape. It is the courage to look at reality with mindfulness and concentration. Thich Nhat Hanh
BRONZE Member
Returning to a unique state of Equilibrium
3,289 posts
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Returning to a unique state of Equilibrium
3,289 posts
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posted:
technical, as in;
that spin was technically good, however I think it lacked artistry and flow.
I think saying that technical is hard (and implying flowing intuitive dancy stuff is easy) isnt supported by my observation that the majority of highly technical spinners Ive seen certainly havent got the dancy flowyness. If it were easy they would have it.
Of course some do, but they are in the minority.
I guess technical could also be applied as a label to spinners who concentrate their efforts on the particular moves they are doing rather than a more holistic approach?
Josh
technical, as in;
that spin was technically good, however I think it lacked artistry and flow.
I think saying that technical is hard (and implying flowing intuitive dancy stuff is easy) isnt supported by my observation that the majority of highly technical spinners Ive seen certainly havent got the dancy flowyness. If it were easy they would have it.
Of course some do, but they are in the minority.
I guess technical could also be applied as a label to spinners who concentrate their efforts on the particular moves they are doing rather than a more holistic approach?
Josh
--
Help! My personality got stuck in this signature machine and I cant get it out!
geek, level 1
5,300 posts
Location: everywhere
5,300 posts
Location: everywhere
Posted:
you must have met some different ones to me then. massively so. i can only think of, maybe four spinners who i would say are in the top ten percent in terms of knowledge of movements(hah! i got out of saying top ten % of techie spinners... no, wait, er...)who don't also dance beautifully. And they are the ones who have made a concious decision to learn in a different style, and not concentrate on 'the flow'.
can you pm me 'bout this? (don't want to get into a public discussion about individuals merits)
smiles
R
Written by: Josh
my observation that the majority of highly technical spinners Ive seen certainly havent got the dancy flowyness
you must have met some different ones to me then. massively so. i can only think of, maybe four spinners who i would say are in the top ten percent in terms of knowledge of movements(hah! i got out of saying top ten % of techie spinners... no, wait, er...)who don't also dance beautifully. And they are the ones who have made a concious decision to learn in a different style, and not concentrate on 'the flow'.
can you pm me 'bout this? (don't want to get into a public discussion about individuals merits)
smiles
R
Holistic Spinner (I hope)
GOLD Member
old hand
920 posts
Location: New Zealand
old hand
920 posts
Location: New Zealand
Posted:
Josh, I dunno what it is about the moderators around here but you guys really should come hang out with me and bluecat (not that me and rob get to hand out nearly enough)
All this talk of tech spinners not flowing. I just don't understand it. Maybe i just have no idea what flow really is. Or maybe you are refering to times spent watching some techy spinner trying over and over to nail a hyperloop.
About 2 years ago I never thought that throwing poi could be done with any degree of style or flow. I WAS WRONG AND I ADMIT IT.
Although i must say that I seem to have lost a certain degree of flow over the last year, it seems far more because i've been focusing on nailing some super tech stuff than because i can't dance.
It's all about the balance poiple, too much tech and no flow looks sloppy, too much flow and no tech looks lame. A good degree of both looks great.
Surely someone agrees with that???
m
Josh, I dunno what it is about the moderators around here but you guys really should come hang out with me and bluecat (not that me and rob get to hand out nearly enough)
All this talk of tech spinners not flowing. I just don't understand it. Maybe i just have no idea what flow really is. Or maybe you are refering to times spent watching some techy spinner trying over and over to nail a hyperloop.
About 2 years ago I never thought that throwing poi could be done with any degree of style or flow. I WAS WRONG AND I ADMIT IT.
Although i must say that I seem to have lost a certain degree of flow over the last year, it seems far more because i've been focusing on nailing some super tech stuff than because i can't dance.
It's all about the balance poiple, too much tech and no flow looks sloppy, too much flow and no tech looks lame. A good degree of both looks great.
Surely someone agrees with that???
m
Spherculism ~:~ The Act of becoming Spherculish.
SILVER Member
Pooh-Bah
1,626 posts
Location: Southampton, United Kingdom
Pooh-Bah
1,626 posts
Location: Southampton, United Kingdom
Posted:
I just don't think that tech is EDIT - fundamental to good spinning. I think you can look great with no tech and still look rubbish with loads of tech. It can totally be the other way round too, but most people seem to be somewhere in the middle, and that's all good. Flow is fundamental to making spinning look good in my eyes, so someone who lacks it and just does mad planes I've never heard of and point isos and inverted antispin whatevers.. it doesn't mean anything unless they can hold it together.
I don't just mean the millions of attempts at tech moves before they come off, we all have that at the end of the day, but when it comes down to a performance or a proper burn where someone's really feeling it as opposed to trying to learn new stuff, the actual meat of spinning, that's where flow matters most to me.
I don't think there's such a thing as too much flow.
But that's just what I go for when it comes to spinning. I think it's a matter of personal taste, at the end of the day.
EDITED_BY: nearly_all_gone (1101987321)
I just don't think that tech is EDIT - fundamental to good spinning. I think you can look great with no tech and still look rubbish with loads of tech. It can totally be the other way round too, but most people seem to be somewhere in the middle, and that's all good. Flow is fundamental to making spinning look good in my eyes, so someone who lacks it and just does mad planes I've never heard of and point isos and inverted antispin whatevers.. it doesn't mean anything unless they can hold it together.
I don't just mean the millions of attempts at tech moves before they come off, we all have that at the end of the day, but when it comes down to a performance or a proper burn where someone's really feeling it as opposed to trying to learn new stuff, the actual meat of spinning, that's where flow matters most to me.
I don't think there's such a thing as too much flow.
But that's just what I go for when it comes to spinning. I think it's a matter of personal taste, at the end of the day.
EDITED_BY: nearly_all_gone (1101987321)
What a wonderful miracle if only we could look through each other's eyes for an instant.
Thoreau
SILVER Member
Carpal \'Tunnel
3,899 posts
Location: Austin, Texas, USA
Carpal \'Tunnel
3,899 posts
Location: Austin, Texas, USA
Posted:
PPP, I agree with all of my poi spinning heart!
PPP, I agree with all of my poi spinning heart!
-v-
Wiederstand ist Zwecklos!
NYC
9,232 posts
Location: NYC, NY, USA
9,232 posts
Location: NYC, NY, USA
Posted:
Well if you water down any statement to the point of total meaninglessness of course we'd have to agree. You're basically saying "Too much" of something is bad. Isn't that implied in the phrase "TOO much"?
And then you're saying that a "good amount" is good?
So after two years of Spherculism we've concluded that:
A 'good amount' of something is good... but 'TOO much' is bad.
Isn't that sort of obvious?
If we don't quantify any tangible information than personal judgements become meaningless.
Written by: PoiPoiPoi
It's all about the balance poiple, too much tech and no flow looks sloppy, too much flow and no tech looks lame. A good degree of both looks great.
Surely someone agrees with that???
m
Well if you water down any statement to the point of total meaninglessness of course we'd have to agree.
You're basically saying "Too much" of something is bad. Isn't that implied in the phrase "TOO much"?And then you're saying that a "good amount" is good?
So after two years of Spherculism we've concluded that:
A 'good amount' of something is good... but 'TOO much' is bad.
Isn't that sort of obvious?
If we don't quantify any tangible information than personal judgements become meaningless.
Well, shall we go?
Yes, let's go.
[They do not move.]
If its got pistons or boobs, its gonna be expensive...
515 posts
Location: Cyprus
515 posts
Location: Cyprus
Posted:
Sooo many opinionated people here lol.
Thats a good thing of course but i think everyone is worring about everone eles replys a little too much!
Sooo many opinionated people here lol.
Thats a good thing of course but i think everyone is worring about everone eles replys a little too much!
Henry Hill - 'One day the kids from the neighbourhood carried my mothers groceries all the way home, you know why? It was out of respect'...
ahmet_20valve_ahmet(at)hotmail(dot)com
Hope all is well : )
SILVER Member
big and good and broken
7,330 posts
Location: lunn dunn, yoo kay, United Kingdom
big and good and broken
7,330 posts
Location: lunn dunn, yoo kay, United Kingdom
Posted:
i think people are replying to each other and not to the original post:
i think we've seen opinions expressing both sides of pretty much all of these 'definitions' of what technical means.
which i think pretty much shows that its a term that has very little use since everyone has a different idea of what it means.
cole. x
i think people are replying to each other and not to the original post:
Written by: simian
People talk about 'Technical' poi quite a lot. Sometimes in a positive way, but often in a way that's almost derogatory.
What does it mean to you? What do you think it means to others?
Moves that are difficult?
Ugly moves?
Moves where your feet are stationary?
Moves that concentrate on details rather than the whole?
if you dance, can your poi be technical?
can technical poi 'flow', or is flow the opposite of tech?
a genuinely rather confused monkey
i think we've seen opinions expressing both sides of pretty much all of these 'definitions' of what technical means.
which i think pretty much shows that its a term that has very little use since everyone has a different idea of what it means.
cole. x
"i see you at 'dis cafe.
i come to 'dis cafe quite a lot myself.
they do porridge."
- tim westwood
member
22 posts
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
22 posts
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posted:
God point, cole. I was about to join the debate, but decided no to. I'll just answer the question instead.
"Technical poi" to me, i suppose, would be a bare bones performance of a move or series of moves, with emphasis given to the technique rather than to the overall aesthetic. Nothing to do with the nature of the moves themselves, but the moves do tend to be quite tricky.
This does not mean that those same tricky moves cannot be incorporated into a more dancey, flowing style, as dance often contains highly technical elements, although the technique is not the focus of the performance.
What do I think "technical poi" means to other people? I reckon some think it describes difficult moves and that others reckon that some moves are exclusive to a purely technical performance due to their complexity.
I remember the above accusation being levelled at hyperloops and air wraps. If you still think this way, please check out the winning entry on COL 5.
Damn... I think I might've joined the debate. Damn.
God point, cole. I was about to join the debate, but decided no to. I'll just answer the question instead.
"Technical poi" to me, i suppose, would be a bare bones performance of a move or series of moves, with emphasis given to the technique rather than to the overall aesthetic. Nothing to do with the nature of the moves themselves, but the moves do tend to be quite tricky.
This does not mean that those same tricky moves cannot be incorporated into a more dancey, flowing style, as dance often contains highly technical elements, although the technique is not the focus of the performance.
What do I think "technical poi" means to other people? I reckon some think it describes difficult moves and that others reckon that some moves are exclusive to a purely technical performance due to their complexity.
I remember the above accusation being levelled at hyperloops and air wraps. If you still think this way, please check out the winning entry on COL 5.
Damn... I think I might've joined the debate. Damn.
PLATINUM Member
Hyperloops suck
595 posts
Location: USA
Hyperloops suck
595 posts
Location: USA
Posted:
I feel that technical poi is any move, or series of movements, that are currently unattainable by the general poi spinning population. As others have said, tech in 2001 is different than tech in 2002 is different than tech in 2004. 5 beat weave was tech. Now 5 beat BTB through wrap weaves are tech (Even that is arguable).
I guess my true definition of tech would be:
Any move or series of movements wherein the person spinning is actively pushing the boundaries of the symbiosis between poi and spinner. If that makes any sense. I hope so. Please?
I feel that technical poi is any move, or series of movements, that are currently unattainable by the general poi spinning population. As others have said, tech in 2001 is different than tech in 2002 is different than tech in 2004. 5 beat weave was tech. Now 5 beat BTB through wrap weaves are tech (Even that is arguable).
I guess my true definition of tech would be:
Any move or series of movements wherein the person spinning is actively pushing the boundaries of the symbiosis between poi and spinner. If that makes any sense. I hope so. Please?
BRONZE Member
rrragghh!
121 posts
Location: Manchester, UK
rrragghh!
121 posts
Location: Manchester, UK
Posted:
Someone has to say it, its gone on too long... Technical by deffinition is applied science and that of requiring specialist knowledge to understand what is going on.
Technical poi to me is just that, understanding what is going on, where the poi is going, seeing what else can be possible and then applying those basic principles into a move that not necessary is very nice and flowing but at the end of the day is possible.
I'm new to the poi scene, I also might be missing something and simian is probably going to brand me as a very annoying person by stating the deffinition, but isn't that it?
Someone has to say it, its gone on too long... Technical by deffinition is applied science and that of requiring specialist knowledge to understand what is going on.
Technical poi to me is just that, understanding what is going on, where the poi is going, seeing what else can be possible and then applying those basic principles into a move that not necessary is very nice and flowing but at the end of the day is possible.
I'm new to the poi scene, I also might be missing something and simian is probably going to brand me as a very annoying person by stating the deffinition, but isn't that it?
110% MONKEY EVERY TIME ALL THE TIME JUST CANT STOP THE MONKEY
3,149 posts
Location: London
3,149 posts
Location: London
Posted:
cole got my point for making the thread bang on the head. One thing i really wanted to show with this thread is that everyone means different stuff by the word "Technical", so arguing about whether Technical poi is good or bad or better or worse is totally illogical, because the terms are not properly defined.
You can generally tell arguments with poorly defined terms because of their really boring and circular nature. See also: arguments involving the words "soul", "nature" and "love".
No rarr, actually i think that's one of the better definitions in this thread
If you'd just had the first paragraph in your post, then i would have done. But the second paragraph kicked ass. i think you are actually a very clever person. But that's often the same thing as annoying anyway
Written by: coleman
which i think pretty much shows that its a term that has very little use since everyone has a different idea of what it means.
cole got my point for making the thread bang on the head. One thing i really wanted to show with this thread is that everyone means different stuff by the word "Technical", so arguing about whether Technical poi is good or bad or better or worse is totally illogical, because the terms are not properly defined.
You can generally tell arguments with poorly defined terms because of their really boring and circular nature. See also: arguments involving the words "soul", "nature" and "love".
Written by: rarr
...simian is probably going to brand me as a very annoying person by stating the deffinition...
No rarr, actually i think that's one of the better definitions in this thread
If you'd just had the first paragraph in your post, then i would have done. But the second paragraph kicked ass. i think you are actually a very clever person. But that's often the same thing as annoying anyway
"Switching between different kinds of chuu chuu sometimes gives this "urgh wtf?" effect because it's giving people the phi phenomenon."
SILVER Member
Carpal \'Tunnel
3,899 posts
Location: Austin, Texas, USA
Carpal \'Tunnel
3,899 posts
Location: Austin, Texas, USA
Posted:
well, now that the original poster has gotten the answer he was looking for, there is no longer any use for this thread...
well, now that the original poster has gotten the answer he was looking for, there is no longer any use for this thread...
-v-
Wiederstand ist Zwecklos!
geek, level 1
5,300 posts
Location: everywhere
5,300 posts
Location: everywhere
Posted:
is that just on a technicality tho van?
is that just on a technicality tho van?
Holistic Spinner (I hope)
SILVER Member
big and good and broken
7,330 posts
Location: lunn dunn, yoo kay, United Kingdom
big and good and broken
7,330 posts
Location: lunn dunn, yoo kay, United Kingdom
Posted:
using that logic, all intro threads should really be closed after the first post...
Written by: vanize
well, now that the original poster has gotten the answer he was looking for, there is no longer any use for this thread...
using that logic, all intro threads should really be closed after the first post...
"i see you at 'dis cafe.
i come to 'dis cafe quite a lot myself.
they do porridge."
- tim westwood
Carpal \'Tunnel
3,638 posts
Location: Brum / Dorset / Fairy Land
3,638 posts
Location: Brum / Dorset / Fairy Land
Posted:
lol...............
glad that was cleared up.
lol...............
glad that was cleared up.
Geologists do it in the dirt................ 
Similar Topics
Using the keywords [technical mean] we found the following existing topics.
- Forums > Lingo [16 replies]
- Forums > i am wondering about something [5 replies]
- Forums > What does Technical mean? [73 replies]
- Forums > technical vs dance vs performance in routine building [96 replies]
Show more..
© 1998 - 2025 Home of Poi
All prices converted to United States dollars using XE.com