Forums > Beginner Poi Moves > Site swaps theory
Login/Join to ParticipateBRONZE Member
HOP librarian
1,841 posts
Location: Prague, Czech. Republic
HOP librarian
1,841 posts
Location: Prague, Czech. Republic
Posted:
Ok, one new think I was thinking about. I can imagine set of tricks not like a cycle of random moves, but like consecution of beat numbes. Its an inspiration from balls and diabolos, but its not dependent on level but plane.
Example from weave family:
333 - BTB Weave
323 - BTB Weave waist wrap
and st. like that.
it has bugs, but its theory
,
any sugestions?
light :R
Ok, one new think I was thinking about. I can imagine set of tricks not like a cycle of random moves, but like consecution of beat numbes. Its an inspiration from balls and diabolos, but its not dependent on level but plane.
Example from weave family:
333 - BTB Weave
323 - BTB Weave waist wrap
and st. like that.
it has bugs, but its theory
,any sugestions?
light :R
POI THEO(R)IST
SILVER Member
Liquid Cow
2,629 posts
Location: High Wycombe, England
Liquid Cow
2,629 posts
Location: High Wycombe, England
Posted:
I suggest you do a search.
Actually, don't bother - I was feeling generous so did one for you...
[Old link] is a rather large thread about poi notation that's got some siteswap type goodness in.
The main problem I see with a notation system in general is that there's loads of stuff that it's never going to be able to describe.
However standard siteswap doesn't distinguish between a 3 ball cascade and a 3 ball mills mess but it's still incredably useful, I say a standardised notation system for poi is a great idea
I suggest you do a search.
Actually, don't bother - I was feeling generous so did one for you...
[Old link] is a rather large thread about poi notation that's got some siteswap type goodness in.
The main problem I see with a notation system in general is that there's loads of stuff that it's never going to be able to describe.
However standard siteswap doesn't distinguish between a 3 ball cascade and a 3 ball mills mess but it's still incredably useful, I say a standardised notation system for poi is a great idea
But there's no sense crying over every mistake. You just keep on trying till you run out of cake.