Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light, not our darkness that most frightens us. We ask ourself, who am I to be brilliant, gorgeous and talented? Who are you NOT to be?
Working hard to be a wandering hippie layabout. Ten years down, five to go!
Written by :willworkforfoodjnr
Obviously at some point you have to trust the word of others, as you can't be an expert in everything.
Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light, not our darkness that most frightens us. We ask ourself, who am I to be brilliant, gorgeous and talented? Who are you NOT to be?
Working hard to be a wandering hippie layabout. Ten years down, five to go!
--
Help! My personality got stuck in this signature machine and I cant get it out!
"Here kitty kitty...." - Schroedinger.
Written by :Pyrolific
Ben - even maths is getting so complex in some areas that the 'proofs' are sometimes taking many years before being exposed as wrong.
Written by :Dentrassi
just because a paper written and submitted to, and approved by a scientific journal doesnt necessarily mean its fault proof
Written by :BrettStar
also the per review process means that theories that disagree with your peers... or new ideas... to get through.... eg flat earrth etc...
Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light, not our darkness that most frightens us. We ask ourself, who am I to be brilliant, gorgeous and talented? Who are you NOT to be?
Faith
Nay, whatever comes one hour was sunlit and the most high gods may not make boast of any better thing than to have watched that hour as it passed
Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light, not our darkness that most frightens us. We ask ourself, who am I to be brilliant, gorgeous and talented? Who are you NOT to be?
There is a slight possibility that I am not actually right all of the time.
Written by :ben-ja-men
Imagine my surprise and ecstatic joy when I discovered that the horizontal field of view was 45 degrees and NOT 50 degrees and shown on the box, manual and manufacturers website. I swear if you haven't proved it yourself then its a LIE. /rant
Written by :ben-ja-men
It makes me wonder how much of the "science" and "facts" that we use in pop science discussions are based on the "truths" found in the written word and just what need an individual must have to challenge these "facts". I wonder if wikipedia where to become like an open peer reviewed journal where you had to submit all your data along with your findings, along with data/links to make changes if it would lead to an exponential leap in accurate knowledge. Thoughts?
According to Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle of Quantum Dynamics, we may already be making love right now...
Using the keywords [stuff truth co * writing] we found the following existing topics.