First of all, i want to make clear that i think megs obsession with "difficulty of trick=quality of trick" is a bit sad and obsessive
Surely being able to get things clean is a good thing, and the main problem of all contact i see is it's lack of cleanliness, which makes me disinclined to spend any more of my time learning it. Exactly like poi tangles in fact.
Also, you seem to be misunderstanding my complaints. I agree that complex spinning patterns are harder to describe than complex contact patterns, and wasn't asking for new stuff to get posted on HOP about spinny stuff. The reason i brought up the number of contact posts in the new moves thread was to highlight the imbalance
which is also in effect wherever i hang around with staffers in the real world. Any time i try to hang out with a group of staff people, i usually end up wandering off after a few minutes of watching them do, yes, contact contact contact contact contact contact.
Having said that...
Well, to make a figure eight as hard as an elbow fishtail i'd probably start to add variations of movement of centre of rotation, dynamic phase change (pointing the stick in different directions relative to the pattern), dynamic timing variation and dynamic crossover point manipulation. The more demanding i make the changes that i'm aiming for, the harder the move gets.
Another question: If spinning is so easy, how come so many people can't learn anti figure 8?
Also: your "main" measure of difficulty is "qualifying" whereas mine seems to be "mastering". This makes your measure bounded, whereas mine is unbounded.
Ceiling of difficulty? Come outside girl, and stop looking at the world through your dirty windows
