Forums > Social Discussion > Morals and ethics-thread... (on public demand)

Login/Join to Participate
Page: 123


Total posts: 6650
Posted:You asked for it - Now you have it!

(did a search and nothing like that came up - if there is a pre-existing thread, please accept my apologies and close this one)

So here it goes:

Wikipedia on Morality

Written by: wikipedia
Morality, in the strictest sense of the word, deals with that which is regarded as right or wrong. The term is often used to refer to a system of principles and judgments shared by cultural, religious, secular (eg. Humanist) and philosophical communities who share concepts and beliefs, by which people subjectively determine whether given actions are right or wrong.

These concepts and beliefs about right and wrong are often generalized and codified by a culture or group, and thus serve to regulate the behavior of its members. Conformity to such codification may also be called morality, and the group may depend on widespread conformity to such codes for its continued existence. Individuals who choose to conform in this way are popularly held to posess "Moral Fibre", whereas those who lack "Moral Fibre" may be labelled as socially degenerate. A "moral" may refer to a particular principle, usually as an informal and general summary with respect to a moral principle, as it is applied in a given human situation.

Same source Ethics

Written by: wikipedia
The first social science
Assumptions about ethical underpinnings of human behavior are reflected in every social science, including: anthropology because of the complexities involved in relating one culture to another, economics because of its role in the distribution of scarce resources, political science because of its role in allocating power, sociology because of its roots in the dynamics of groups, law because of its role in codifying ethical constructs like mercy and punishment, criminology because of its role in rewarding ethical behavior and discouraging unethical behavior, and psychology because of its role in defining, understanding, and treating unethical behavior.

Members of HoP:

Written by: Patriarch
First, let us ask some questions to get us started:

Question 1: What is the ultimate source of moral rights?

(suggested answers deleted for freedom of mind)

Question 2: Do moral rights change?

(suggested answers deleted for freedom of mind)


Written by: jeff(fake)
(..)In an general sense morality is relative. However, for arbitary reasons human beings world wide share an almost identicle fundemental system of emotions and values. A Chinaman and an African can both agree that murder and rape are generally wrong for instance. We base our moral system on these values. Thus morality is in a specific sence absolute accross the human race.(..)

(..)Humans (thats us) have a set of needs and emotions which are hardwired into our brains. With the exception of sociopaths and some of the brain damaged, this is undeniable. We all retract our hand from fire and we find suffering unpleasant.(..)

So here are the questions:

What is the source of morals?
Do morals change?
Is morality something fundamental, that is hardwired into our brains?

yeah - "can of worms" rolleyes not the first one wink

the best smiles are the ones you lead to wink

Delete Topic

GOLD Member since Jun 2001

Stream Entrant
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Total posts: 2830
Posted:FireTom check out this morality test

cheers smile

If we as members of the human race practice meditation, we can transcend our fear, despair, and forgetfulness. Meditation is not an escape. It is the courage to look at reality with mindfulness and concentration. Thich Nhat Hanh




Total posts: 6650
Posted:Hmm dunno, whether it's possible to measure how ethical a person behaves through asking him stereotypical questions, giving him stereotypical choices...

32.5 is not too moralistic, though *phew*

But it's some attempt... thanks for the link smile

EDITED_BY: FireTom (1143802594)

the best smiles are the ones you lead to wink


SILVER Member since Jul 2003


currently mending
Location: Bristol, New Zealand

Total posts: 493


And that was despite my advocation of breaking laws.

He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze long into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you.



BRONZE Member since May 2005


Location: York University, United Kingdo...

Total posts: 1762
Posted:38... but I'm not happy (as always rolleyes) with the restricted choice of answers.

Reasonable test through. shrug

After much consideration, I find that the view is worth the asphyxiation.
I may disagree with what you have to say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.




Location: NYC, NY, USA

Total posts: 9232
Posted:38. I tried to then answer the questions as badly as I could (quickly mind you) and got a 23.

I figured I'd have gotten lower but I guess the bottom isn't zero.

Well, shall we go?
Yes, let's go.
[They do not move.]


Page: 123

Similar Topics

Using the keywords [moral* ethic* public demand] we found the following similar topics.
1. Forums > Public consultation on possible badger cull (UK) [40 replies]
2. Forums > Morals and ethics-thread... (on public demand) [65 replies]
3. Forums > Moral & Ethical Issues associated with Recombinant DNA Technology [55 replies]
4. Forums > Ethics vs. Relationships [34 replies]
5. Forums > Public transport [23 replies]

     Show more..