we are all one...as we are part of space, space is also part of us.
"but have you considered there is more to life than your eyelids?"
jointly owned by Fire_Spinning_Angel and Blu_Valley
Written by: Mr MajestikNo, science is a tool. I don't 'believe' in science and ultimately I couldn't care less whether I was using magic or technology. But science just happens to be what works. When you build a light bulb powered by Christian faith then I'll happily use that. .
science is a religion
According to Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle of Quantum Dynamics, we may already be making love right now...
Written by: Mr Majestik
science is a religion
Written by: Mr Majestik
science cannot prove or disprove the existance of god because it works within the confines of a logical world of cause and effect. therefore scientists can learn through science and still be unbias christians/jews/muslims, technically...........whether they do or not is another question, nobodies perfect!
"Moo," said the happy cow.
ture na sig
"Moo," said the happy cow.
There is a slight possibility that I am not actually right all of the time.
"but have you considered there is more to life than your eyelids?"
jointly owned by Fire_Spinning_Angel and Blu_Valley
-v-
Wiederstand ist Zwecklos!
Written by: i8beefy2
Religion is not just revealed truth.
Written by: i8beefy2
Note here that I am not saying what I apparently appeared to be saying: that religious experiences are only explanable through religious interpetation. Here is a fact: religious experience happens. It is a phenomenon experienced by people all the time to varying degrees. If there is something objective about those experiences (indeed if they can be objective) then perhaps there are other answers to explain it.
Written by: i8beefy2
Science builds models, yes, that reflect our observations. As such, it really builds models of how we perceive and interact with the world. But science is still DONE in a material realist assumption (up until quantum mechanics, which is breaking down some of those barriers), that is that the world is represented to us relatively accurately by our senses (note that things not directly perceptable are still perceptable through indirect means). My point is, science does not say anything about how the world actually is, only about how it appears to us, and thus is not True (capital T). Essentially what you said.
Written by: i8beefy2
If you really think science disproves religions, you should look into Richard Dawkins. Personally, after reading him I find him just as silly as the hard core theists... but for some reason he is the discipline standard on the issue... there's another book out by one of his collegues called "Dawkin's God" which nicely picks him apart. At best science can not speek of the purly religious domain... it doesnt prove atheism as Dawkins argues (purly psychological answers for why religions are not true).
"Moo," said the happy cow.
According to Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle of Quantum Dynamics, we may already be making love right now...
Ahhhh Life.......So many wonderful shades of grey.
-Mike
Certified Mad Doctor and HoP High Priest of Nutella
A buckuht n a hooze! -Valura
-v-
Wiederstand ist Zwecklos!
Written by: •L•I•G•H•T•N•I•N•G•
I disagree with Vanize. If a higher power exists, then it should be detectable in some way, shape, or form because one would assume that a high power would be able to interact with the material world.
"You can't outrun Death forever.
But you can make the Bastard work for it."
--MAJOR KORGO KORGAR,
"Last of The Lancers"
AFC 32
Educate your self in the Hazards of Fire Breathing STAY SAFE!
ture na sig
What exactly do I have to light on fire to get you to notice me?
What exactly do I have to light on fire to get you to notice me?
Written by: drakematrix
It has been argued that if we knew the exact position and vector of every single particle in the universe, it would be possible to predict the future, because even the content of our thoughts are governed by the electrons firing in our brains. Of course, the mathematical calculations necessary to do so would be staggering. and it also destroys the concept of free will, and I just don't like that at all... Unfortunately, I haven't found a logical arguement against all that, so I slowly become more athiest every day as I find myself forced to accept that possibility
-v-
Wiederstand ist Zwecklos!
Written by: onewheeldave
Even if they know where to look for 'God', they couldn't do so- their laws of physics would not allow it (being restricted to the 2-D plane).
'God' could interact with the world, but would not need to; and, if he/she choose to interact, it would be easy to do so in a way that could not be detected within that world.
"Moo," said the happy cow.
Written by: i8beefy2
However on the esoteric level, the hidden Truth in all religions or that they all access and then attempt to describe (which isnt unlike science), religious claims ARE confirmable. Practice and you will see.
"Moo," said the happy cow.
ture na sig
Love is the law.
ture na sig
Love is the law.
"Moo," said the happy cow.