Our website uses cookies to personalise content, keep contents in your shopping cart and as part of the checkout experience.
Your personal information you provide will be transfered and stored as encrypted data.
You have the ability to update and remove your personal information.
You consent to our cookies if you continue to use this website.
Allow cookies for
Necessary Cookies Necessary Cookies cannot be unchecked, because they are necessary for our website to function properly. They store your language, currency, shopping cart and login credentials.
Analytics Cookies We use google.com analytics and bing.com to monitor site usage and page statistics to help us improve our website. You may turn this on or off using the tick boxes above.
Marketing Cookies Marketing Cookies do track personal data. Google and Bing monitor your page views and purchases for use in advertising and re-marketing on other websites. You may turn this on or off using the tick boxes above.
Social Cookies These 3rd Party Cookies do track personal data. This allows Facebook, Twitter and Pinterest integration. eg. shows the Facebook 'LIKE' button. They will however be able to view what you do on our website. You may turn this on or off using the tick boxes above.
RicheeBRONZE Member HOP librarian 1,841 posts Location: Prague, Czech. Republic
Posted: Star, can be defined as figure symmetric only by 1 midline or half circle spin, or flower in flower, independent spin. Everything else than a regular flower.
Posted: Nice idea. It took me a few reads to stop thinking about goofy flowers (one hand regular, the other antispin).
Have faith in what you can do and respect for what you can't
[Nx?]BRONZE Member Carpal \'Tunnel 3,749 posts Location: Europe,Scotland,Both
Posted: shame.
i see the relevance bettwen the patterns you have drawn in code and a paper snowflake, but i dont really see how thats aplying to spinning poi.
are you just making some snowflake patterns and then thinking about how you could achive them with poi? are you talking flower variations here?
Or are you actually saying something new about flowers? cos if you are i just dont get it.
anyone who does understand want to re-explain?
if you dont have a mouse, maybe you should put more effort into your text description, you know, hand positions, directions of spin, things like that? The code just looks confusing
T
This is a post by tom, all spelling is deleberate -><- Kallisti
RicheeBRONZE Member HOP librarian 1,841 posts Location: Prague, Czech. Republic
Posted: I want to say ,that can be proven, when you quarter a 'class' flower, that the one quarter is simetrical by it's centre line.
Calling a shape, created by modifing one half of the quarter, star. Know- ing this, giving you many new spossible shapes that may can be done with Poi.
I'll corect the imagesand rewrite the crypto tommorow.
lightning,
:R
POI THEO(R)IST
GeoffonTour04SILVER Member enthusiast 360 posts Location: Oxford, United Kingdom
Posted: ok I think it means that because a flower is 4 identical quarters, by affecting each circle in the same way a little bit, it changes the overall effect greatly?
RicheeBRONZE Member HOP librarian 1,841 posts Location: Prague, Czech. Republic
Posted: Partialy true, it's necessary to change
olny one quarter. Frower = 4 * quarter.
Star = 4 * eigth + 4 * eight.
lightning,
:R
POI THEO(R)IST
RicheeBRONZE Member HOP librarian 1,841 posts Location: Prague, Czech. Republic
Posted: Minor update..
I'm thinking about the new patterns a lot nowaday, also I like the way it's sorted in '[Old link]'.
I think, '[Old link]' show only the evolve in shape instead of evolution of technique or not?
It's very hard to distinguish between technique, theory and move.