На нашем веб-сайте используются файлы cookie для персонализации контента, содержания содержимого в корзине покупок и в рамках проверки.
Ваша личная информация будет сохранена и передана в виде зашифрованных данных.
У вас есть возможность обновлять и удалять вашу личную информацию.
You consent to our cookies if you continue to use this website.
Разрешить куки для
Necessary Cookies Необходимые файлы cookie не могут быть отключены, потому что они необходимы для правильного функционирования нашего веб-сайта. Они хранят ваш язык, валюту, корзину покупок и учетные данные для входа.
Файлы cookie для Google Analytics Мы используем google.com analytics и bing.com для мониторинга использования сайта и статистики страниц, чтобы помочь нам улучшить наш сайт. Вы можете включить или выключить это с помощью меток, указанных выше.
Маркетинговые куки Маркетинг Cookies отслеживает личные данные. Google и Bing отслеживают ваши просмотры страниц и покупки для использования в рекламе и ремаркетинге на других сайтах. Вы можете включить или выключить это с помощью меток, указанных выше.
Социальные куки Эти сторонние Cookies отслеживают личные данные. Это позволяет интегрировать Facebook, Twitter и Pinterest. например. показывает кнопку Facebook «LIKE». Тем не менее, они смогут просмотреть, что вы делаете на нашем веб-сайте. Вы можете включить или выключить это с помощью меток, указанных выше.
Posted: so, ive been thinking about this for some time, the notion that humans are too smart for this planet, that we have outwitted nature
take this example of natural selection.. normally in nature if an animal is born with a limp, blind, or disabled in any other way, that creature is bound to be one of the first to die because it has a harder time protecting itself.. if that animal were to live and pass on its genes, and in the end result in a genetic mutation in that species, that would mean that that gene (or lack of perhaps) is better for that species in terms of survival.. we humans however have found ways of keeping the blind, the disabled and aged people alive and healthy and allow them to lead a relatively normal life, through aid of medicine, guide dogs,etc.. to what extent do people think that humans have outsmarted nature??
PyrolificBRONZE Member Returning to a unique state of Equilibrium 3,289 posts Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posted: no I dont believe ppl are too smart. Research suggests that most people stop developing their ethical and logical reasoning abilities at a very basic level, perhaps equivalent to grade 6 average (12 year olds). This level is charaterised by among other things, a misconception of the balance between self needs and social needs. If anything, the majority of people are too stupid.
Josh
-- Help! My personality got stuck in this signature machine and I cant get it out!
Mr MajestikSILVER Member coming to a country near you 4,696 posts Location: home of the tiney toothy bear, Australia
Posted: yeah wonder monkey, childrens development depends largely on their parents and other humans close to them in their early life. i saw a study that was done on a girl who had been kept locked in a room until her teens with no communication and she couldn't communicate as people do normally. the study showed that people are only the way they are because of society and that without people around them they act basically like primates. following that theory its possible if you bring up a child in the right enviroment there are many things you could make them.
an example of this is hot housing where children being learning before they are enve born and then go to a special school from a young age where they are feed all this information which is meant to make their lives better. what eventuates is a smarter person in some aspects but you can see there is something different about them, its very interesting and i'm starting to rant so i'll stop!
"but have you considered there is more to life than your eyelids?"
jointly owned by Fire_Spinning_Angel and Blu_Valley