I'm pretty much cool with anything as long as there is actually a background scenery that's a place, not necessarily recognisable specifically by us as X country, my geography, geology and knowledge of international flora and fauna is terrible

,just not simply someone's back yard (unless they live somewhere spectacular anyway (china, egypt, japan, etc))
Some of the mexico and barbados photo's for example I think are lush, but not specific places, or recognisable landmarks but very easily recognisable as somewhere beautiful, and out of the ordinary for most people.
It was just the ones with no visible background what so ever that annoyed me. Otherwise anything should be left for judgement, George and the HoP management are judges and should remove anything they legitimately feel unworthy by any of the stated rules without qualms, that is what the rules are there for after all.
Anyway, I'm not a judge this is just my opinion
