the problem is that your long description doesn't really cut it either monkey...
taking just the circle-circle relationship we have this:
"patterns that are produced by following a point rotating on the circumference of a circle, the centre of which is rotating about the circumference of another circle"
this is called 'epicyclic motion' and was invented by ptolomy to describe the retrograde motions of the objects in the night sky - he was a bit of a geek you see but i'm sure we can all relate.
we call these compound circle patterns because that's what nick called them and that's exactly what they are - hence, the name makes loads of sense.
there is then the special case of epicyclic patterns where the relative rotations of the two circles are opposite to each other - this is the technique that we currently refer to as 'antispin'.
so, we are now at a point where we are particularly interested in those antispin patterns that are not composed of two separate circles but rather a circle that moves on a path that can be any pattern at all.
we have three choices:
1. an addendum to 'antispin', which implies that the motions made with our hands are something other than circles (irregular antispin?)
2. extend the concept of antispin to encompass this wider definition
3. make up a cool new word that sits above antispin but below compund patterns in the hierarchy of terms
i would say just go for number two (with a little number one if its really required).
having said that, i think the word '
retrograde' rocks
if we have to use yet another word to describe these patterns, that's the one i like.
it not only sounds cool but it actually has something vaguely to do with what's going on in the patterns.
"that's some sh!thot retrograde spinning you got going on there"
"that's a retrograde pattern i've never seen before - what are the component patterns?"
epicyclic -> opposite rotation epicyclic -> non circular epicyclic
compound pattterns -> antispin -> retrograde
cole. x