#559132 - 24/05/05 06:46 PM
Re: Please do a search
[Re: Valura]
|
Sparkely arty Mormon rainbow fairy
Registered: 18/03/05
Loc: infront of you
|
there should be a window that pops up when they press the 'New Thread' button
Have you done a search? |Yes|.........|No|
If they click no then they are Not Allowed and taken to the search page.
_________________________
Property of Fine_Rabid_Dog
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#559133 - 24/05/05 07:29 PM
Re: Please do a search
[Re: Boo_Bunny]
|
Penguin of Mass Destruction and Tricky Bugger to the court of Claire the Askew
Registered: 05/05/05
Loc: Check behind you.
|
Of course then that'd be interfering with the silliness and game threads if people are honest and after a while people would get used to the reminder and just click yes automaticly. Something would be good though. An extra search button beside the new thread typing box perhaps (I know there's one right at the top of the page but people get used to thier homey web architecture. Even an arrow to it might help.)
_________________________
Chucks nuns
Property of mynci and blu_valley, and proud of it.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#559134 - 24/05/05 08:22 PM
Re: Please do a search
[Re: Seb]
|
comfortably numb
Registered: 08/07/04
Loc: The countryside
|
This post makes me want to start a new thread telling people to do searches. Just to annoy you, Valura. *giggles* Nah I'm kidding. Well said 
_________________________
.All things are beautiful if we take the time to look.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#559135 - 24/05/05 08:27 PM
Re: Please do a search
[Re: roarfire]
|
Classically British
Registered: 23/09/01
Loc: Guildford, Surrey, England
|
Yo. If there was some clever script writer, instead of having a "have you done a search yes/no" frame - a quick auto-search on your proposed thread title would be cool. Say you wrote a title called "How do I get green fire?" then it could automatically run a search and point out the top 3 relevant results saying "do these answer your question?" But yes - do a search kids. It keeps us old-skoolers happy 
_________________________
Obey this man and thou shalt suffer no wrath.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#559136 - 24/05/05 09:06 PM
Re: Please do a search
[Re: Durbs]
|
blank
Registered: 27/08/02
Loc: Warwickshire
|
Written by: Valura
have noticed that lately there seems to be an abundance of duplicate threads popping up, due to the fact that people dont bother to do a search or dont refine the search enough to find the threads.
http://www.homeofpoi.com/ubbthreads/show...=&bodyprev=
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#559138 - 25/05/05 12:10 AM
Re: Please do a search
[Re: Hanz]
|
Pirate Pixie Crew Captain
Registered: 12/08/04
Loc: Wales
|
What would help a lot more for people doing searches for topics is if the people posting the threads put titles on the threads that were actually about what is in them rather than cryptic titles.
_________________________
Feed me Chocolate!!! Feed me NOW!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#559140 - 25/05/05 12:43 AM
Re: Please do a search
[Re: brodieman]
|
Gatherer of Lost Souls...
Registered: 02/07/04
Loc: Behind you...
|
I agree with Skully, cryptic titles sometimes suck. I've done so many, many searches on this site into glow poi and glow toys to find reviews and info, but I'm sure there must be more on this site about it I haven't seen because the threads don't always fit into the search criteria. Grumble grumble.
I've been tempted a few times to start a new, definitive thread for glow toys to pull all the info into one place, but don't want to annoy anyone so I haven't.
_________________________
Idolized by Aurinoko
Take me disappearing through the smoke rings of my mind....
Bob Dylan
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#559141 - 25/05/05 12:45 AM
Re: Please do a search
[Re: brodieman]
|
NYC
Registered: 26/08/01
Loc: NYC, NY, USA
|
I feel like this is one of those things that those who'd be guilty of it wouldn't pay attention.
Like those signs in front of open doors that say "Please go around and enter the building though the security checkpoint."
_________________________
Well, shall we go? Yes, let's go. [They do not move.]
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#559142 - 25/05/05 01:01 AM
Re: Please do a search
[Re: NYC]
|
blank
Registered: 27/08/02
Loc: Warwickshire
|
Written by: brodieman
This hole militant do a search thing can be precieved as unfriendly and unwelcoming.
True, but i know for a fact that sometimes people are pure and simply lazy, they'll even admit afterwards that they couldn't be arsed to do a search. There's plenty of information when you join up telling you to search, post in the right forum etc, if people can't be bothered to read and follow the rules then they don't even deserve a reply. Telling someone to do a search is the next step up in friendlyness.
Its far better to have good definitive threads, pooling together all contributions in one place than hundreds asking the same thing, with one or two flakey replies. If duplicate threads weren't locked/deleted then the wonderful friendly and welcoming community we do have would turn into one of the many thousand improperly moderated boards on the net (such as steampowered.com), where there's a constant flow of people coming in because people get annoyed too quick with the lack of organisation.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#559143 - 25/05/05 01:20 AM
Re: Please do a search
[Re: flid]
|
HOP Mad Doctor
Registered: 28/05/01
Loc: San Francisco, CA
|
Hey, what kind of music do you all listen to?
*ducks and runs*
_________________________
-Mike )'( Certified Mad Doctor and HoP High Priest of Nutella
"The Bay Area is so beautiful, I hesitate to preach about Heaven when I go there." -Billy Graham
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#559144 - 25/05/05 01:53 AM
Re: Please do a search
[Re: Doc Lightning]
|
NYC
Registered: 26/08/01
Loc: NYC, NY, USA
|
It's acutally even more annoying because now, when someone DOES do a search, they'll get this AND every other redundant thread.
If some poor soul does a search on C*lored Flames, they'll get 3000 redundant threads.
I personally think excessively redundant threads should be deleted so they don't end up in the search engine.
We've all made that mistake at some point, including myself. I wouldn't have a problem if one of my mistakenly redundant threads was deleted.
But I'm wacky that way...
_________________________
Well, shall we go? Yes, let's go. [They do not move.]
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#559145 - 25/05/05 02:18 AM
Re: Please do a search
[Re: NYC]
|
newbie
Registered: 29/10/04
Loc: Eindhoven, the Netherlands
|
everyone that makes a thread about searching uses the colored flames example. I think you should be original and use a different example, that way you will always find a thread about searching when your searching.
_________________________
so you think Im not a newbie? Ok I'll be the King of the newbies. Nucleon the king of all noobs
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#559146 - 25/05/05 02:20 AM
Re: Please do a search
[Re: nucleon]
|
HOP Mad Doctor
Registered: 28/05/01
Loc: San Francisco, CA
|
I've found that the search function is really bad at resurrecting the thread I want, though...
_________________________
-Mike )'( Certified Mad Doctor and HoP High Priest of Nutella
"The Bay Area is so beautiful, I hesitate to preach about Heaven when I go there." -Billy Graham
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#559147 - 25/05/05 02:36 AM
Re: Please do a search
[Re: Doc Lightning]
|
big and good
Registered: 29/08/02
Loc: lunn dunn, yoo kay
|
some kind of site policy on 'good threads' would be nice, even if there was no duplicate check installed on new posts.
simian's tangles thread was an excellent example of what could be done but for it to be of any use to those searching for information, i think it needs to be supported more.
like having sticky threads for searches, or even better a 'common searches' thread made sticky at the top of each section.
if i knew that my work would be preserved, i would happily construct some threads collecting together the useful links about a particular subject but as it stands, effort like that is quickly lost to the boards and finding even threads that just contain good links requires a good search with correct use of accurate search terms (i.e. they are just as hard to find as the others if you don't already know that it is there).
but i realise these ideas require changes to the site or at the very least, a definite change in the organisation of the threads in the forums and that is for the site admin to decide, not us.
cole. x
_________________________
"i see you at 'dis cafe.
i come to 'dis cafe quite a lot myself.
they do porridge."
- tim westwood
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#559148 - 25/05/05 03:06 AM
Re: Please do a search
[Re: coleman]
|
NYC
Registered: 26/08/01
Loc: NYC, NY, USA
|
I was thinking that would be effective as well. Back in the day we started doing articles but haven't seen many of those lately. You can lead a horse to water but apparently, you can't make him do a search before posting. 
_________________________
Well, shall we go? Yes, let's go. [They do not move.]
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#559150 - 25/05/05 04:05 AM
Re: Please do a search
[Re: simian]
|
Liquid Cow
Registered: 03/09/01
Loc: High Wycombe, England
|
Put them in the staff moves section, no-one ever posts in there anyway so they'll stay at the top  Could we have posts like that added as replies to Dom's Welcome and FAQ stickied thread? I'm not keen on the idea of having them all sticked because we'd end up with loads of them, but having them all in an obvious and easily found place would be great.
_________________________
But there's no sense crying over every mistake. You just keep on trying till you run out of cake.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|