#388258 - 31/08/04 01:36 PM
~* What Came First? *~
|
Member
Registered: 29/08/04
Loc: South East UK
|
and the classic follow up to that phrase....the chicken or the egg? feel free to add your own Qs!!  x
Edited by Dom to remove caps from the title!
Edited by Dom (01/09/04 11:51 AM)
_________________________
~* so, my love, your laughter is finally turning to tears, and you're begging for more, though the end is getting near *~
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#388259 - 31/08/04 02:20 PM
Re: ~* WHAT CAME FIRST? *~
[Re: ItsAllTears]
|
journeyman
Registered: 21/08/04
Loc: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
|
Well, quite obviously that egg came first. from a purely darwinian point of view of course.
Consider evolution as the process of natural selection. The great (repeat indeffinitely) ancestors of the chicken would have grown evolved and changed to suit their surroundings. Consider the ascension staircase at Rock Rodondo. Where species of bird had slowly evolved so that some of the gulls had harder beaks to crack open the shells of hard nuts, whilst other gulls had evolved differently to catch insects, thus had a softer suppler beak. The "Chickens" mother, would have been something that was not quite a chicken yet in almost every way was, then when that pseudo chicken laid an egg out popped the slightly evolved but superior chicken. This chicken then would have in some way ensured the downfall of all it's predecessors, probably through the use of chemical warfare and nuclear chicken weapons.
Of course it can also be argued that through creationism god created everything perfectly. Therefore the chicken came first.
Well there ya go.
_________________________
I don't care who you vote for
Just don't vote for the guy who likes war, destruction and earning money over earning respect.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#388261 - 31/08/04 08:19 PM
Re: ~* WHAT CAME FIRST? *~
[Re: Hanz]
|
Classically British
Registered: 23/09/01
Loc: Guildford, Surrey, England
|
Egg.
Has to be an egg for the chicken to come from, but it might not have been a chicken that laid it (It would've been some pseudo-chicken)
_________________________
Obey this man and thou shalt suffer no wrath.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#388262 - 31/08/04 08:52 PM
Re: ~* WHAT CAME FIRST? *~
[Re: Durbs]
|
journeyman
Registered: 21/08/04
Loc: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
|
Hey don't get me wrong hanz. I'm very strongly christian. Sometimes the idea of creationism is bit hard to comprehend.
_________________________
I don't care who you vote for
Just don't vote for the guy who likes war, destruction and earning money over earning respect.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#388263 - 31/08/04 10:55 PM
Re: ~* WHAT CAME FIRST? *~
[Re: Fleance]
|
professional pedant
Registered: 24/07/03
Loc: Bristol
|
A quick thought: even if you do take the creationist viewpoint, what's to say that god didn't put an egg on the earth rather than a fully formed chicken?
_________________________
A warrior always returns to the fray. He never does so out of stubbornness, but because he has noticed a change in the weather - Paulo Coelho
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#388266 - 31/08/04 11:58 PM
Re: ~* WHAT CAME FIRST? *~
[Re: Durbs]
|
veteran
Registered: 07/06/04
Loc: Bendigo, Vic, Australia
|
Written by: Durbs
Cos, it would've broken when it fell from heaven?
I like, I like.
And I know that creationism is hard to comprehend but why would He place an egg on earth and not something that is fully formed. and in Genesis it says He created all the animals... so if this is the case, wouldnt the chicken come first as it is the animal, and the egg isnt (well, not yet) Although, do correct me if I am wrong, I am open to NICE FRIENDLY suggestions.
By the way, not yelling, just trying to make clear
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#388269 - 01/09/04 12:43 AM
Re: ~* WHAT CAME FIRST? *~
[Re: Fabergé]
|
Fireotographer on Hiatus
Registered: 29/07/04
Loc: Cork, Ireland
|
I guess Flame Boy has a point - and so does Fleance of course....
(As a notorious chicken I would say the chicken was first  )
_________________________
"I see," said the blind man.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#388270 - 01/09/04 03:02 AM
Re: ~* WHAT CAME FIRST? *~
[Re: Fräulein]
|
Lord Ballchain
Registered: 21/08/01
Loc: Austin, Texas
|
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#388274 - 01/09/04 04:37 AM
Re: ~* WHAT CAME FIRST? *~
[Re: OrangeBobo]
|
Satisfying HOPs Lust For Fire
Registered: 23/07/04
Loc: Salem, Oregon
|
ok, so here's another question... what came first, the can or the can opener?
_________________________
Never settle for normal. 
Average thinking brings average results.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#388275 - 01/09/04 05:03 AM
Re: ~* WHAT CAME FIRST? *~
[Re: Madam Flame]
|
Pirate Pixie Crew Captain
Registered: 12/08/04
Loc: Wales
|
the Can
_________________________
Feed me Chocolate!!! Feed me NOW!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#388276 - 01/09/04 05:34 AM
Re: ~* WHAT CAME FIRST? *~
[Re: Skulduggery]
|
journeyman
Registered: 21/08/04
Loc: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
|
Ahh again if we take a darwinian stand. Obviously the.......nah actually i can't be rooted.
So my for real and serious stand point on how the world was formed is thus.
WHO CARES
ok that was a little bit loud. Just wanted to premise this little vomitous mass with that as i think it really underlines that whether We evolved from apes or whether God made us, isn't important. It's the way we behave now that counts.
So, evolution has some massive flaws, for example, when species of animal diversify they actually lose information from their genetic code. It is not physically possible for an organism to add to it's own genetic makeup without some help. In order to become a part of the food web animals actually lose information to become unique and individual in terms of the way they act etc. All of this makes it REAL hard for a fish of some discription to walk up on land and think "Hey, those trees look comfy, i might shack up in them for awhile."
This leaves us with Creationism. Again, massive problems. Mainly due to the fact that creationism leaves us no explanation for the millions of year old fossils and what not that are clearly and scientifically dated to days when there is no evidence of man.
There is heaps of other things wrong with both theories but as it is 3.33 am here in Melbourne i think i'll leave them for another day. But personally i think that truth lies somewhere in between.
Now that i have highjacked this thread and realised it is a venomous snake, i will put the heshen bag gently on the ground and slowly back away. As you were gentlemen, as you were.
_________________________
I don't care who you vote for
Just don't vote for the guy who likes war, destruction and earning money over earning respect.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|