flid using flid's computer that has been commendeered:
I'm loothed to recomend one, because I've seen a huge variation in quality of sub 60 quid cameras. I bought a 40 quid one 2 years ago (1.3 megapixel, no colour lcd) which takes ok(ish) photos under good light conditions, crap photos in low level (the flash is effective upto about 30cm) and because it doesn't have a screen, you can't see what you've taken, just delete the last one if you want. Internel memory should be avoided. I bought one with a slot, but the slot never worked. The battery compartment was poorly molded and on a couple of accoassions came loose and I lost all my photos. On another occassion due to it not having auto-power-off I lost all my photos of a great weekend away. Saying you don't care about quality is one thing, but as strugz said 2 megapixel is really the absolute minimum. Anything less is a childs toy.
I've recomended ones to people in the past on a strictly 'I haven't tested this' basis, and people generally seem ok with it, but you do need to do lots of research if that's your budget, because there is a lot of crap on the market now and you'll really need to hunt out the best. Beware of:
a) Digital zoom (as opposed to optical). It's meaningless. It just means the camera will zoom the same way you can on a computer in mspaint where it showa part of the picture and guesses pixels inbetween the ones it samples. It'll just give you crap photos. If you need to, do it on a computer afterwards, it'll probably look better.
b) Optical zoom. Optical zoom is a must if you're paying over 150 quid, but if you find somethine with it for your budget it's likely to be an uber cheap lens. Just as I'd never recomend a telescope under 500 quid boasting a high optical magnification the same is true of sub 150 quid cameras. It may sound snobby, but it's not. Too many people try to get into a hobby by buying equipment that's trying incorperate features far better than it is, and end up giving up when they see how crap the results are.
c) Interpolated pixels. Again, marketting

. You should be looking at actual or effective pixels. It's basically digital zoom, it takes up more memory space (so it stores less photos) and it isn't the quality it claims. I've seen 2megapixel cameras sold as 6megapixel interpolated. It's a big trick used by cheap camera sellers. If you look at cheap hi-fi you'll see PMPO rated speakers, which boast stupidly high wattage output. The rest of the world uses RMS rating, but the PMPO value is roughly 4 times more, so a 25watt speaker can be sold as 100watt. It impresses people new to hi-fi, but no one else.
d) Cameras without flash. Assuming you live in the UK where it's not always sunny that is....
If you can, find something made by a good camera manufacturer. This may be hard, but if possible will give you much better peace of mind that if something goes wrong in 12 months you know who to return it to. Like many things in the electronics world there's very few manufacturers out there, but some of them sell their products to otehr companies, who bagde the products as theres. Such companies are very rarely based in the UK and the shipping costs of returning faulty goods to the manufacturer is more than the cost price for a one off. Companies like Trust (ironic I know), Packard Bell, Murphy Richards etc don't make any of their own stuff. Slightly larger companies make the finished product, but none of the gubbins inside. This can be a good thing, if you know what's inside before you buy. I bought a dell widescreen tft last month. I'd never buy from dell normally (and wouldn't blindly buy from them in the future), but I found it's exactly the same lcd used in apple cinema monitors, and made my a manufacturer i trust. I paid over 130 less than any apple cinema monitor i could find on sale over the period of a month, and it looks stunning

. If you can't find one by a big camera manufacturer, make sure you get something that other people have bought and reviewed, and be warned that if you buy it online, it may not look like the thing you ordered